Dick Bond Associates, Inc. v. Oakland Consolidated Corp.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the *764appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Salter v. Knowles, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 138; Shuler v. Allen, Fla.1955, 76 So.2d 879; Mellet v. Henry, Fla.App.1959, 108 So.2d 69; and Good v. Douglas Gardens, Fla.1951, 50 So.2d 349.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and MAGER, JJ., concur.