Wallace v. State

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Cornelius v. State, Fla.1950, 49 So.2d 332, and Beard v. State, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 680.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.