Pierce v. State

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.App.1971) and Johnson v. State, Fla.App., 260 So.2d 212, opinion i filed March 23, 1972.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ-, concur.