dissents. The trial judge’s ruling refusing to vacate defendant’s requested issuance of subpoena duces tecum was not erroneous. In his broad discretion the trial judge has found that response to the subpoena duces tecum was not unreasonable or oppressive. I would not substitute this Court’s judgment for the trial judge’s in a matter of this nature just as I would be so disinclined were the requested subpoena by the State.