is of the opinion an evi-dentiary hearing is required. There is no showing of compliance with Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. See dissent in State ex rel. Billiot v. Henderson, No. 54,644 our docket this date, 294 So.2d 822.