dissents, being of the view that Thompson v. Warmack, 229 So.2d 352 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1969) represented a preferable interpretation than that expressed by Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Lasseigne, 255 La. 579, 232 So.2d 278 (1970).
DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ„ dissent.