dissents from the refusal to grant. From the application, it appears there has been no pretense of compliance with Art. I, Sec. 19, La.Const. of 1974.
CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ.,are of the opinion the writ should be granted, and an evidentiary hearing held to determine whether defendant intelligently waived his rights to “a complete record of all evidence upon which the judgment is based,” which minimally means a recordation of the evidence at trial.