Dieckbrader v. State

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), .Florida Statutes (1975); Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The appellant does not have to be present at resen-tencing.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and GRIMES and SCHEB, JJ., concur.