A. P. v. State

PER CURIAM.

The only point presented on this appeal urges that the trial court erred in adjudicating respondent delinquent in that the State failed to prove an overt act committed in furtherance of the crime of attempted burglary. Our review of the record in the light of the briefs presented shows that the point is without foundation in that the respondent and several others actually approached a vehicle and removed parts of it. See Sections 810.02 and 777.04, Florida Statutes (1975).

Affirmed.