Pitts v. State

PER CURIAM.

The appellant seeks review of a summary denial of his motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.

The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So.2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.