The revocation of appellant’s probation is affirmed, but we remand for the lower court to strike the finding of violation of the condition requiring payment of court costs. Appellant did not admit this violation, and there was no evidence to show that appellant was able to pay the costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
HOBSON, A. C. J., and SCHEB and RYDER, JJ., concur.