133 F.3d 921
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
AFRICAN-AMERICAN VOTING RIGHTS LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, INC.;
Elbert A. Walton; Charles Q. Troupe; O.L. Shelton; Vernon
Thompson; Errol S. Bush; Theodore Hoskins; Phillip B.
Curls; Robert Bradley; Luretta B. Hawkins; St. Louis
Council of Black Elected Officials, Inc.; Black Elected
County Officials, Inc., Appellants,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI; Leo G. Stoff; George Mehan; Judith
Coleman; James R. Willard; Cynthia L. Ewert; Junious
Buchanan; Ann M. Presley; Board of Election Commissioners,
Jackson County, Missouri, in their official capacity;
Thomas F. Simon, in his official capacity; Vivian Schmidt,
in her official capacity as a member of the Board of
Election Commissioners of the County of St. Louis, MO;
Francis Barnes, III, also known as Bud Barnes, in his
official capacity as a member of the Board of Election
Commissioners of the County of St. Louis, MO; Patrick
Hickey, Jr., in his official capacity as a member of the
Board of Election Commissioners of the County of St. Louis,
MO; Mel Carnahan; Rebecca Cook; Stanley A. Grimm; Gary
A. Fenner; Edward D. Robertson; Mavis Thompson; Gene
Overall; Jaci Morgan; John Moten, Appellees.
No. 97-1885.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 14, 1998.
Filed Feb. 4, 1998.
Before BOWMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and JONES,1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
After a bench trial, the District Court2 rejected plaintiffs' claims that the Missouri Non-Partisan Court Plan provisions for the selection of appellate court and certain trial court judges are invalid under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. The court set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in a fifty-five page opinion, and entered judgment for the State of Missouri and the other named defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
Having considered the case, we conclude that the decision of the District Court is correct and that extended discussion would add nothing of substance to the thorough and well-reasoned opinion of that court.
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.