The appellant’s robbery conviction is reversed for a new trial because the trial judge erroneously denied a requested instruction that intent to deprive is an essential element of the crime. Bell v. State, 394 So.2d 979 (Fla.1981).
The appellant’s robbery conviction is reversed for a new trial because the trial judge erroneously denied a requested instruction that intent to deprive is an essential element of the crime. Bell v. State, 394 So.2d 979 (Fla.1981).