Defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted sexual battery. We affirm. Defendant asserts the court erred in denying admission into evidence of testimony regarding the victim’s past sexual conduct. We conclude that the testimony was properly excluded under the rationale of Hodges v. State, 386 So.2d 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), wherein the court stated in relevant part:
[T]he evidence must be of such a nature as to give rise to a reasonable assumption that because the victim engaged in a certain disclosed pattern of conduct or behavior, the victim probably consented to the same with the accused.
The testimony here showed only that the victim had been previously raped and previously had illegitimate children. This did not meet the requirements of Section 794.-022(2), Florida Statutes (1979).
Defendant’s last argument is that the court erred in denying his requested jury instruction on absence of flight when the police arrived. We find no error in this regard and the judgment below ,is thus affirmed.
AFFIRMED.