Hull v. State

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retain jurisdiction for armed robbery, inasmuch he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as required by section 947.-16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).

SCHEB, C. J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.