Recardo v. State

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s probation was revoked for failure to pay court costs and costs of probation- supervision. This was improper because there was no evidence from which the court could find that appellant had the financial ability to pay such costs. Coxon v. State, 365 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new hearing on the question of appellant’s ability to pay.

GRIMES, A. C. J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.