Back v. State

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, having failed to. do so at trial, seeks to raise for the first time on appeal the issue of the lack of evidence of intent to commit theft. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.380(b); Patterson v. State, 391 So.2d 344 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); De La Cova v. State, 355 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We affirm.

ANSTEAD, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.