Coleman v. State

*691ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In its petition for rehearing the appellee asks that we reconsider our decision on the authority of Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Although the plea colloquy is not set out in Hardison, we acknowledge that our ruling appears to conflict with the holding therein. Having acknowledged this apparent conflict, we deny the petition for rehearing.

LETTS, C. J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.