Cates ex rel. Cates v. Graham

JORGENSON, Judge,

concurring specially-

I concur with the result reached for the reasons advanced in the majority opinion. Were I free to write upon a clean slate, I would hold that section 95.11(4)(b) is unconstitutionally applied to this minor plaintiff. Under the principles announced in Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So.2d 431 (Fla.1973), I cannot do so and, therefore, concur in this result.