State v. Baro

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the appellee’s motion to dismiss and the state’s traverse thereto raise an issue of material fact as to appellee’s participation in the burglary that formed the basis of the charges against the appellee. Cf. State v. Davis, 243 So.2d 587 (Fla.1971).

ANSTEAD, C.J., and HURLEY and DELL, JJ., concur.