During the hearing on appellant’s motions to suppress and to dismiss, his counsel stipulated that the issues were dispositive and that he would not need a jury. The state argues that by these actions appellant’s counsel waived appellant’s right to a speedy trial. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. We disagree. See State v. Ansley, 349 So.2d 837 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977).
Reversed and remanded with directions to discharge appellant.