West v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, MOTION TO CERTIFY CONFLICT, AND MOTION TO STAY MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

The state’s motion for rehearing is denied, but its motion to certify that our decision is in direct conflict with Carlton v. State, 418 So.2d 449 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982), and its motion to stay issuance of the mandate is granted.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

SCHEB, J., concurs specially.