Dean v. State

MILLS, Judge.

We have reviewed the record and Dean’s pro se brief in this case which is before us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and have found no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ„ concur.