Hurst v. State

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellant has too many concurrent convictions to enumerate. We affirm the judgments of conviction against the appellant but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement as to the sentences running concurrently with “any active sentence being served.” See Yates v. State, 429 So.2d 815 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983).

REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOON-OVER, J., concur.