Affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the personal representative an extension to file an objection to the claim, “even though the statutory time limit [had] expired prior to the filing of the motion for extension.” In re Estate of Sale, 227 So.2d 199, 201 (Fla.1969); see also In re Estate of Oxford, 372 So.2d 1129, 1132 (Fla.2d DCA 1979).
GRIMES, A.C.J., and RYDER and DAN-AHY, JJ., concur.