Valderrama v. State

PER CURIAM.

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are affirmed upon a holding that the evidence error complained of was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced at trial against the defendant Javier Yalderrama, including the defendant’s own trial testimony. Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223, 93 S.Ct. 1565, 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969).