Appellant’s substantive points are without merit. He also expresses concern over the wording of the judge’s order which reduces his sentence so as to fall within the sentencing guidelines. We construe the judge’s order reducing his sentence to five and one-half years to refer to both the sentence entered for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and the concurrent sentence for the sale of cocaine.
Affirmed.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and DANAHY and HALL, JJ., concur.