We affirm defendant’s convictions for sexual battery and kidnapping.
We find no merit in his contentions except his contention that there was error in retaining jurisdiction over the first one-third of his sentence. See Hawkins v. State, 463 So.2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Carter v. State, 464 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
Accordingly, we strike that portion of the sentence retaining jurisdiction.
LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.