State v. Hurst

BARKETT, Justice,

concurring specially.

I concur only because this case is controlled by our decision in State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). Justice Ehrlich’s dissenting opinion in that case repre*1070sents, in my view, the correct position on this issue.

EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur.