Layton v. State

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. The denial of Layton’s Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.800 and Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.250 motions is affirmed without prejudice to the claim of improper consideration of juvenile convictions obtained in violation of the right to counsel being raised by a motion for post conviction relief pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.

BOOTH, C.J., ERVIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.