Riley v. State

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand to the trial court for the purpose of eliminating from the probation order any requirement that appellant pay restitution for property for which he was not charged with having removed from the burglarized van. Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla.1977).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.