Smith v. State

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order because we find several of the trial judge’s reasons for deviating from the guidelines to be improper. See the companion case of Love v. State, 515 So.2d 364, (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We remand for resentencing in accord with the holding in Albritton v. State, 476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985).

HERSEY, C.J., ANSTEAD and DELL. JJ., concur.