D.H. v. State

PER CURIAM.

A careful review of the record fails to demonstrate that the state proved the identity of the appellant as the perpetrator of the crime; we therefore reverse the adjudication and order D.H. discharged. See Z.P. v. State, 440 So.2d 601 (Fla.3d DCA 1983); W.J. v. State, 406 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Ponsell v. State, 393 So.2d 635 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).

Reversed.