Pearce v. State

PER CURIAM.

We recognize that the conviction of a codefendant was vacated;1 however, there are distinguishing facts presented in this case. Accordingly, we affirm Pearce’s convictions for trafficking in cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia.

AFFIRMED.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

. Elias v. State, 526 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).