Clements v. Sun Bank/Miami, N.A.

PER CURIAM.

The record presents genuine issues of material fact as to whether the appellee acted with reasonable care and expedition in undertaking a reinvestment program of trust assets as represented to the appellant. See Banfield v. Addington, 104 Fla. *309661, 140 So. 893 (1932); Floyd v. Video Barn, Inc., 538 So.2d 1322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). The summary judgment under review is therefore reversed.