dissenting.
I dissent for the same reason I dissented in State v. Hatten, 560 So.2d 1172 (Fla.1990). The district court here held that convictions for sale and simple possession cannot be based on a single act. In my opinion, this conflicts with Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), in that sale and simple possession contain different statutory elements and address different evils.
EHRLICH, C.J., concurs.