AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in refusing to instruct the jury on the issue of entrapment, since there was no evidence presented of government action that a jury could have concluded would constitute entrapment. Cf. Terwilliger v. State, 535 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Similarly we find no error in the other instructions given to the jury without objection. Cf. Farrow v. State, 573 So.2d 161 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).
ANSTEAD, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.