We reverse defendant’s habitual offender sentence on the basis that the trial court erred by failing to make the supporting findings required by the habitual offender statute. Section 775.084(l)(a) 1-4, Fla.Stat. (1989); Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289, 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Although the issues raised in the special concurrence are wor*1071thy of thought, we decline to consider those issues at this time.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur. LEHAN, J., concurs specially.