Dixon v. State

PER CURIAM.

The challenged judgments of conviction are affirmed. Because the court failed to make the necessary findings when sentencing the appellant as a habitual felony offender under section 775.084, Florida Statutes, the sentences are vacated and this case is remanded for resentencing. See Walker v. State, 462 So.2d 452 (Fla.1985), and Roberts v. State, 559 So.2d 289 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

SMITH, ZEHMER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.