The only point raised in this appeal challenges the validity of conditions 6, 9, 10, 18 and 19 which were imposed in the written order of probation. We strike these special conditions of probation because they did not conform to the oral pronouncement of sentence imposed at the sentencing hearing. Labar v. State, 584 So.2d 37 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Affirmed, except remanded for conformance of the sentence to the oral pronouncement.
DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.