concurring specially.
I agree with the majority that the appellant’s conviction should be affirmed. On *701one issue, that of allowing a police officer to give opinion testimony as to the appellant being the “main guy” in the drug conspiracy alleged, I believe error has been demonstrated. However, upon review of all the evidence, I believe such error was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).