Gomez-Cortes v. Agency for Health Care Admin.

Per Curiam.

*357Appellant contends that the Agency for Health Care Administration erred when it denied his motion to vacate without affording him an evidentiary hearing to resolve the factual question of whether he received sufficient notice of AHCA's final orders. We agree. See Reich v. Dep't of Health , 868 So.2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED .

Wolf, Jay, and Winsor, JJ., concur.