concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Although I concur in the majority’s opinion on the sentencing issues, I believe the trial court committed reversible error in admitting, over objections, testimony by a state witness as to statements about the incident by the victim, as well as the witness’ opinion as to the truthfulness of these statements. I cannot find this testimony harmless under the test set out in State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).