James v. State

PER CURIAM.

We have for review James v. State, 613 So.2d 25 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict of decisions. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). The district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.