Rhoads v. State

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal, Rhoads v. State, 608 So.2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA1992), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418 (Fla.1981). The district court’s decision is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.