Cook v. State

PER CURIAM.

We review Cook v. State, 609 So.2d 175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), on the ground of conflict. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. The decision of the district court of appeal is quashed and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.