We review Bailey v. State, 621 So.2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA1993), based on a certified question. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We answered the question in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). The decision of the district court of appeal with respect to petitioner’s sentencing is accordingly quashed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Tripp.
It is so ordered.
BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.