Coleman's Adm'x v. Anderson

Burks, J.,

concurred in the opinion of Anderson, J.

Staples, J.,

did not concur in the opinion of Anderson, J.; but as, if he dissented, the decree of the court below would be affirmed, by reason of the court being equally divided, which result he thought would be worse than that which would follow from the effect of Judge Anderson’s opinion, he therefore concurred in the results of that opinion.