Thomas v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date filed: 1994-04-27
Citations: 636 So. 2d 156, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3898, 1994 WL 149711
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Lead Opinion
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We believe the trial court’s inquiry at trial into appellant’s complaints about his counsel was sufficient under the circumstances of this ease. See Watts v. State, 593 So.2d 198 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 3006, 120 L.Ed.2d 881 (1992); Causey v. State, 623 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), rev. denied, No. 82,845 (Fla. Feb. 17, 1994); Boudreau v. Carlisle, 549 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), cause dismissed, 557 So.2d 866 (Fla.1990).

ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., and MAGER, GERALD, Senior Judge, concur.