Firestone v. Hinds

MINER, Judge,

dissenting.

Because I believe the claimant failed to establish by expert testimony a causal con-*515neetion between his work related accident and his complaints of hip pain, I respectfully dissent. At best, Dr. Bercaw’s overall testimony is vague, ambiguous and inconclusive, so much so that I believe it to be wholly insufficient to support a finding of causal relationship.